Kinkazzo Burning
~ reflections & disquisitions
It takes both sunshine and rain to make a rainbow...


Consciousness & Intentionality

To say one has an experience that is conscious (in the phenomenal sense) is to say that one is in a state of its seeming to one some way. In another formulation, to say experience is conscious is to say that there is something it's like for one to have it. Feeling pain and sensing colors are common illustrations of phenomenally conscious states. Consciousness has also been taken to consist in the monitoring of one's own states of mind (e.g., by forming thoughts about them, or by somehow "sensing" them), or else in the accessability of information to one's capacities for rational control or self-report. Intentionality has to do with the directedness or aboutness of mental states — the fact that, for example, one's thinking is of or about something. Intentionality includes, and is sometimes taken to be equivalent to, what is called ‘mental representation.’

It can seem that consciousness and intentionality pervade mental life — perhaps one or both somehow constitute what it is to have a mind. But achieving an articulate general understanding of either consciousness or intentionality presents an enormous challenge, part of which lies in figuring out how the two are related. Is one in some sense derived from or dependent on the other? Or are they perhaps quite independent and separate aspects of mind?

And do you give a rat's ass?

You can't say civilization don't advance... in every war they kill you in a new way
If you can't annoy somebody, there's little point in writing.
~Kingsley Amis

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

What is a mind?
my brain is alive!How is it related to a body?

Descartes answer was substance dualism. A person consists of an immaterial substance (mind/soul) attached to a material substance (a body). But this thesis fails a crucial test. An immaterial substance cannot move a body; therefore a mind cannot move a body.

Somewhere in this blog of mine, I shall assume that to have a mind one must first have a brain. This is a materialist perspective. Some weaknesses in this perspective will be described. I shall argue that minds do not necessarily exist as entities, that we nevertheless are aware of our own mental events and that we are aware that other people have similar events.


Directly linked to my heart:
when it stops, I die.

Ain't this fun?

Go and check it out...

Where's your head?
The Locus of Faith

Hey, but let's relax...

Lake Hermon,Israel
If I am not for myself, then who will be for me? And if I am only for myself, what am I? And if not now, when?
~ Rabbi Hillel ~

Notwithstanding all of the above, though, here's another question for you...
Does consciousness survive death?

One simple change in our worldview would have the most profound and dramatic effect on our lives. And it is this: to see, as Eastern philosophies have long seen, that the brain does not give rise to consciousness.
~:~ The brain is an organ of thought and memory, and has evolved as such for a variety of reasons. It pays for an animal to be able to remember what has happened to it so that it has a better chance of repeating its successes and avoiding its failures. It pays to know how to respond most appropriately to fellow members of your species or clan, especially if you have to fit in with a social structure in which complex interrelationships play a central role. It pays to be able to speculate about the future, analyze situations, and work out novel strategies. It pays –- if you are to stay alive and prosper in a niche as incredibly intricate as that of Homo sapiens –- to have inside your skull a two-hundred-billion-unit neural net of unprecedented power for processing and storing information. You have to be able to think and remember extraordinarily well. But the point so often overlooked is that there is absolutely no reason why you should have to be conscious.

[read more…]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

11 Utterly Enriching Reactions:

  • Virginity like bubble, one prick all gone.

    By Anonymous Alter Ego, at 28 December 2006 at 23:34:00 GMT  

  • Proofread carefully to see if you any words out.

    [get it? get it?]

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 28 December 2006 at 23:38:00 GMT  

  • Hi & thanks for getting back in touch... I got "tagged" by a friend:- an internet quiz that's getting transferred blog-2-blog these days: you're supposed to ansa the questions then pass it on to 5 others...
    ...when I got it I hadn't seen your reply. I'm new to blogging only been doing it at all for 2 months so I haven't known anyone for longer than that. If I had have had your answer I'd have definitely asked you (though I don't know that it's strictly your cup of tea)... if you ARE up for answering the questions, tho, I'd be most fascinated in your responses...

    All the best,


    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 23 January 2007 at 23:57:00 GMT  

  • Re consciousness. When I was younger I used to "wonder what it was" (what is the point in that) - I mean you KNOW you are conscious. That is the definition. To try and stretch it any further than that... well you become meaningless.

    ... Like computers do not have consciousness. But they can think. But they don't have consciousness. HOW CAN WE BE SO SURE...?>>>.....

    By Anonymous GLEDWOOD, at 30 January 2007 at 23:48:00 GMT  

  • No, Gled, I usually reject chain-tags... boring and useless.
    But just for you, since you promise to be fascinated by my response: fire away!

    And one more thing: how can I help you stop hitting your baser parts?
    Or even: how can I make you stop altogether, man? losing consciousness fast...

    By Blogger daubmir, at 31 January 2007 at 20:46:00 GMT  

  • Come & have a go at my horrorscope competition over at mine! Horrorscopes: the original stimulus of the Cretin Response!!!

    By Blogger Gledwood, at 8 February 2007 at 13:20:00 GMT  

  • Chain tags? O I see you were talking of that thing I got caught with ... I know I'm not saying anything about tags people will keep laughing at me even more than they usually do ...

    By Blogger Gledwood, at 8 February 2007 at 13:21:00 GMT  

  • I got a real multilingual response to that Chinese (traditional of course, I don't go for vandalized "simplified". Nothing is simple in my world so why the Chinese language..?

    I gotta preposition for you. on in that by and whatever. No. My friend Ruth is doing a "sponsored comments" on her ruth-boofie.blogspot blog. If you put your Hebrew in the top box there, she is collecting 100 comments so £50 goes to cancer charity... nothing else would be asked of you...

    OK take it easy Daubs


    By Blogger Gledwood, at 20 February 2007 at 13:25:00 GMT  

  • daubmir, my friend
    i had heard you were dead- ha ha! yet here we are, together again.
    poitu varam

    By Blogger jollybeggar, at 2 March 2007 at 14:37:00 GMT  

  • Great minds invariably attract each other, and there is a constant return -- jollyB, you've always been in my heart: communion transcends the universe...

    How long can you sustain a note?


    By Blogger daubmir, at 2 March 2007 at 20:53:00 GMT  

  • Alright there! You've been quiet lately!

    Come see my giant wasps killing bees vid you will love it. Well I think it's fantastidoodles ...

    By Blogger Gledwood, at 11 March 2007 at 21:32:00 GMT  

Post a Comment

<< Home


Burped by Flogger